BELVIDERE:
Kathy Redeker, 2000-0070-1 - 02/02/01
Consent Order: Indefinite Suspension. Violations: SR 1-1, 1-5(b) of the USPAP.
Respondent violated the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice ("USPAP"), by failing to be aware of, understand and correctly employ those recognized methods and techniques that are necessary to produce a credible appraisal. Additionally, Respondent failed to properly research, analyze and report prior sales data of the subject property.
CHICAGO:
Norman Futrell, 2000-0071. Violations: USPAP Standards Rule 1-1(b), (c) and Standards Rule 2-1(a)
Order: This matter having come before the Real Estate Appraisal Board of the Office of Banks and Real Estate of the State of Illinois (OBRE), and the Board having made certain Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and a Recommendation to the Commissioner of this agency; and the OBRE having complied with all required notices; that Respondent's acts or omissions constitute violations of USPAP Standards Rule 1-1(b), (c) and Standards Rule 2-1(a). It is therefore ordered that the Certification of Registration, License No. 156-001010, heretofore issued to Norman Futrell to carry on the practice of a Real Estate Appraiser in the State of Illinois is hereby revoked pursuant to the terms and conditions contained in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendation to the Commisisoner.
Marilyn Hicks, 2001-00154-1 - 12/05/01
Consent Order: Two-Year Suspension. Violations: 225 ILCS 457/15(a)(b).
Respondent prepared reports after her license as a Certified Residential Appraiser expired. When subsequently asked to produce her license, she altered her expired license to falsely reflect that her license was renewed.
Kenneth J. Washington, 1999-0138, 2000-0029 - 04/06/01
Consent Order: Two Year Suspension
Violations: SR 1-1, 1-5 of the USPAP
Respondent violated the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice ("USPAP"), by failing to be aware of, understand and correctly employ those recognized methods and techniques that are necessary to produce a credible appraisal. Specifically, by failing to verify documents of comparables given to him by a mortgage broker and failing to inspect the subject property when the report stated that the Respondent did inspect the subject property; and, by failing to collect, analyze, and reconcile such comparable sales data.
CREST HILL:
Christopher D. Baldwin, 2000-0013 - 08/29/01
Consent Order: Reprimand and $5,000 fine.
Violations: Respondent violated the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), Standards Rule 1-1, by failing to be aware of, understand and correctly employ those recognized methods and techniques that are necessary to produce a credible appraisal. Specifically, the Respondent supervised and co-signed an appraisal report which utilized inappropriate comparable properties outside the market area of the subject property, instead of more appropriate comparable properties located within the subject's market area. Additionally, Respondent violated SR 2-1 by supervising and co-signing an appraisal report that failed to enable the reader to properly understand the report by failing to inform the reader that the actual ages listed in the market grid were actually the effective ages of the comparables which were obtained from the MLS.
Respondent violated Standards Rule 1-1, by failing to be aware of, understand and correctly employ those recognized methods and techniques that are necessary to produce a credible appraisal regarding a mixed use property. Specifically, the Respondent failed to report and site data other than the property is rectangular; failed to report total square footage or square footage of various units; failed to identify zoning of the property or the requirements of B 2-1; failed to do a highest and best use analysis; failed to develop or present a credible sales comparison analysis, cost analysis or income analysis.
DWIGHT:
Herbert Voights, 2000-0084 - 06/01/01
Consent Order: Indefinite Suspension Violations: SR 1-1, 2-1 of the USPAP
Information has come to the attention of the Agency that Respondent violated the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice ("USPAP") by preparing a misleading appraisal report. Respondent also violated the USPAP by failing to process and communicate the three traditional approaches to value in a manner that was not misleading.
FAIRVIEW HEIGHT:
Edward Dahlhoff, 10/19/01
Consent Order: Violations: SR 1-1, 1-4, 1-5, 2-2(a)(ix)
Respondent violated the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice ("USPAP"), Standards Rule 1-1, by failing to be aware of, understand, and correctly employ those recognized methods and techniques that are necessary to produce a credible appraisal. Specifically, respondent omitted that the subject property was located within a short distance of two burnt out and boarded up properties. Respondent violated SR 1-4 by failing to analyze such comparable sales data as are available to indicate a value conclusion and instead utilized properties of superior values, larger square footage, and different locations without making adequate line adjustments. Additionally respondent violated SR 1-5 by failing to properly research, analyze and report the subject's prior sales data history. Respondent also violated SR 2-2(a)(ix) by failing to report the reasoning that supports the analyses, opinions, and conclusions in the appraisal report.
Cheryl D. Oliver, 1999-0139, 1999-0161 - 04/06/01
Consent Order: Two Year Revocation. Violations: SR 1-1, 1-5 of the USPAP
Respondent violated the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice ("USPAP"), by failing to be aware of, understand and correctly employ those recognized methods and techniques that are necessary to produce a credible appraisal. Specifically, Respondent failed to disclose the identity of the person who assisted in the inspection and data search of subject property number one. Additionally, Respondent violated the USPAP, by failing to properly research, analyze and report the subject’s prior sales history data Additionally, the Respondent failed to disclose that subject property number two abuts a lake, by utilizing inappropriate adjustments, and by failing to explain a time adjustment for comparable property number two, which is two years old.
FOREST PARK:
Patrick A. Noland, 2000-0013-2 - 12/05/01
Consent Order: License Reprimanded, $2500 fine. Violations: USPAP Standards Rule 1-1, 2-1.
Respondent violated the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice ("USPAP") by failing to be aware of, understand and correctly employ those recognized methods of techniques that are necessary to produce a credible appraisal. Specifically, the Respondent utilized inappropriate comparable properties outside the market area of the subject property, instead of more appropriate comparable properties located within the subject's market area. Additionally, Respondent failed to enable the reader to properly understand the report by failing to inform the reader that the actual age listed in the market grid were actually the effective ages of the comparables which were obtained from the MLS report.
HARRISBURG:
Dean Bittle, 2001-0017-1 10/19/01
Consent Order: Reprimand and $500 fine. Violations: SR 1-1, 2-1 and 1-4 (b)
Respondent violated the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice ("USPAP"), Standards Rule 1-1 and 2-1, by failing to be aware of, understand and correctly employ those recognized methods and techniques that are necessary to produce a credible appraisal, by failing to verify the comparable sales and by erroneously reporting the gross living area of both the subject and comparable properties. Additionally, Respondent violated SR 1-4(b) by failing to properly analyze such comparable sales data as are available to indicate a value conclusion.
HAWTHORNE WOODS:
Henry K. Smilie, 2001-00124-1 - 12/20/01
Consent Order: License Reprimanded, $1500 Fine. Violations: USPAP Standards Rule 1-1, 1-5(b), and 2-1(a).
Respondent violated the Uniform Standard of Professional Appraisal Practice ("USPAP") by failing to be aware of, understand and correctly employ those recognized methods and techniques that are necessary to produce a credible appraisal for various properties from May 1999 until October 1999. Specifically, during a six-month period, Respondent failed to properly research, analyze and report prior sales data, listings or options on several properties and failed to provide accurate comparable properties which resulted in misleading reports.
HOFFMAN ESTATES:
Emil Raha, 2000-00153-1 - 12/05/01
Consent Order: License Indefinitely Suspended. Violations: USPAP Standards Rule 1-1.
Information has come to the attention of the Division that Respondent violated the Uniform Standards Professional Appraisal Practice ("USPAP"), by failing to be aware of, understand and correctly employ those recognized methods and techniques that are necessary to produce a credible appraisal.
ROCKFORD:
Parker D. Moyer, 2000-0062-1 - 12/20/01
Consent Order: License Reprimanded, $2500 fine. Violations: USPAP Standards Rule 1-1, 1-1(b), 1-5, 2-1(a).
Respondent violated the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice ("USPAP") by failing to be aware of, understand and correctly employ those recognized methods and techniques that are necessary to produce a credible appraisal for the property located at 303-313 Mulberry Street, Rockford. Specifically, during a two year time period, Respondent prepared three appraisal reports with vastly disparate values, which were a result of certain errors of omission, namely failing to analyze sales history and opinions; and failing to disclose the sales history which resulted in misleading reports.
Gary A. Zondonatti, 2000-0027-1 10/19/01
Consent Order: Reprimand. Violations: SR 1-1 and 1-5
Respondent violated the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice ("USPAP"), Standards Rule 1-1, by failing to be aware of, understand and correctly employ those recognized methods and techniques that are necessary to produce a credible appraisal. Respondent also violated, USPAP, SR 1-5 by failing to properly research, analyze and report the subject's prior sales data history.
SPRINGFIELD:
Christine Anderson, 1997-0102, 1998-0002, 0116,1999-0106, 0105 - 08/01/01
Consent Order: Probation, $1,000 fine
Violations: USPAP, Standards Rule 1-1(a), (b) and c, by failing to be aware of, understand and correctly employ those recognized methods and techniques that are necessary to produce a credible appraisal. Specifically, by not adequately defining neighborhood boundaries, by failing on one occasion to verify sales information obtained from a real estate broker, and in some cases utilizing inappropriate comparables that were in some respects dissimilar to the subjects.
ST. LOUIS, MO:
Chris M. Puricelli, 2001-00131-1 - 12/05/01
Consent Order: Two-Year Suspension, $1000 fine. Violations: USPAP Standards Rule 1-1, 1-1(b), 2-1.
Agencies
Services